<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" standalone="yes"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>Spoiledlunch</title><link>https://b698e01d.spoiledlunch.pages.dev/</link><description>Nerdy Stuff. Tech Talk. Zero Freshness. Analysis and commentary on GRC, security, and AI.</description><generator>Hugo 0.160.1</generator><language>en-us</language><lastBuildDate>Tue, 16 Jun 2026 09:00:00 -0400</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://b698e01d.spoiledlunch.pages.dev/tags/siem/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/><item><title>The SIEM Did Not Fail; Your Data Model Did</title><link>https://b698e01d.spoiledlunch.pages.dev/articles/2026-05-01-the-siem-did-not-fail-your-data-model-did/</link><pubDate>Tue, 16 Jun 2026 09:00:00 -0400</pubDate><guid>https://b698e01d.spoiledlunch.pages.dev/articles/2026-05-01-the-siem-did-not-fail-your-data-model-did/</guid><description>Article • June 16, 2026 • 6 min read | Topics: Security | Security teams love to declare that the SIEM failed them. It is a clean story. The platform was noisy, expensive, slow, or hard to operate. Leadership understands vendor disappointment. Procurement …</description><author>Spoiledlunch</author><category>Security</category><category>siem</category><category>detection engineering</category><category>logging</category><category>data model</category></item></channel></rss>